Kmoksy
11 Куартолэзе 2010 пыриськиз
Пушкесэз ӵушемын Пушкесэз ватсамын
42-тӥ чур:
::Yes, the Udmurt and Turkish grammars are very close, but not identical: there is no analog for the "simple" Turkish construction in Udmurt. The Udmurt equivalent for ''yetişmek'' is (in that case) ''будыны'' (to grow), for ''yaşamak'' — ''улыны'' (to live). Tne nomina agentis derived from both of these infinite forms are resp. ''будӥсь'' (the growing one) and ''улӥсь'' (the living one). --[[Викиавтор:Denis|Denis]] 12:33, 12 инвожое 2011 (UTC)
:::Thanks, thanks, thanks! You are a dragon of the Language warriors (in "simple" Turkish: ''Sen bir canavarsın''). The Finn-Ugor Languages are very very closely with Turkic Languages. The Meadow and Hill Mari languages "very very very" close with Turkish language. The Udmurt, Komi-Zyrian and Perem Komi languages "very very" close with Turkish language. But, the Mordwin (Erzya and Moksha) languages are not close :-( Thanks for ''улӥсь'' . I'm bad translator :-) --[[Викиавтор:Kmoksy|Kmoksy]] 12:49, 12 инвожое 2011 (UTC)
:::: I'd say that Komi-Zyrian and Komi-Permyak are not so close to Turkish because of the very Russified syntax (not to mention the vocabulary). E.g.: common Komi ''Коля мунӧ урок вылӧ'' / literally ''Kolya goes
:::::Ops! The sorting of similarity with Turkic and Finno-Ugric: very similar ← Meadow Mari - Hill Mari - Udmurt - Komi-Zyrian - Komi-Permyak - Moksha - Erzya → little similar--[[Викиавтор:Kmoksy|Kmoksy]] 13:57, 12 инвожое 2011 (UTC)
::::::Evet öyle --[[Викиавтор:Denis|Denis]] 15:07, 12 инвожое 2011 (UTC)
| |||